I am really tired of the spin being made that the citizens who oppose the Obama health care reform plan are right-wing tea-bagging kooks. The people's fear is real and it does not come from pill-popping talk show hosts like Rush Limbaugh or white-collar criminal insurance thugs like Rick Scott.
Americans everywhere sense something is gravely wrong with our nation and our government. Many of them may not know exactly what has put their country in its current state, but they know that they are being mislead on many levels. In the last week, that instinct has manifested itself nationwide as citizens voice their anger at lawmakers over the 1,000-plus page health care reform package currently on Capitol Hill. We the People sense something is amiss with this bill. And our instincts are correct. Read the following quotes and links direct from the bill itself and the eugenicists that crafted the Obama plan.Does it look like partisan disinformation when you read the health care bill and see that it encourages euthanasia beginning on page 429-430?Quote:
A) For purposes of this section, the term ‘order regarding life sustaining treatment’ means, with respect to an individual, an actionable medical order relating to the treatment of that individual that—. . . (ii) effectively communicates the individual’s preferences regarding life sustaining treatment, including an indication of the treatment and care desired by the individual;‘. . .
(B) The level of treatment indicated under subparagraph (A)(ii) may range from an indication for full treatment to an indication to limit some or all or specified interventions. Such indicated levels of treatment may include indications respecting, among other items- . . . (i) the intensity of medical intervention if the patient is pulse less, apneic, or has serious cardiac or pulmonary problems; ‘‘(ii) the individual’s desire regarding transfer to a hospital or remaining at the current care setting; ‘‘(iii) the use of antibiotics; and ‘‘(iv) the use of artificially administered nutrition and hydration.’’.
Gee Mr. President, I guess I have my tinfoil helmet strapped on too tight, because in laymen’s terms it looks like that section basically says:“Sorry Grandma, you and your disease have become an undue burden to the system. Big Brother says you don't get any hydration, food or antibiotics today.”Folks better not get dementia.
Rahm Emanuel's brother, Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, an Obama Special Advisor for Health Policy, would make them worm food. services provided to individuals who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming participating citizens are not basic and should not be guaranteed. An obvious example is not guaranteeing health services to patients with dementia.According to Emmanuel, the sickest will die first because of rationing of care:
Favouring those who are currently sickest seems to assume that resource scarcity is temporary: that we can save the person who is now sickest and then save the progressively ill person later. However, even temporary scarcity does not guarantee another chance to save the progressively ill person. Furthermore, when interventions are persistently scarce, saving the progressively ill person later will always involve depriving others. When we cannot save everyone, saving the sickest first is inherently flawed and inconsistent with the core idea of priority to the worst-off .Here is another portion of the bill causing controversy. It pertains to the fear of the government having access to bank accounts.Page 59:‘‘
(C) enable electronic funds transfers, in order to allow automated reconciliation with the related health care payment and remittance advice;If the above passage said:"allow electronic funds transfers, with patient consent, in order to allow . . ."I don't think there would be a problem. However, in its current state, the bill does not say that. That is a problem, IMO. Most disturbing of all in regard to the Obama health care reform team is the history of current Obama science czar, John P. Holdren.Holdren Forced To Respond To Controversy Over Totalitarian Population Control Proposals
Obama’s top science and technology adviser John P. Holdren has been forced to issue a statement in which he denies advocating the totalitarian population control proposals outlined in his own academic textbook. However, Holdren’s response is a tissue of half-truths, spin and outright lies.
The controversy began when fresh attention was given to passages from the 1977 book Ecoscience, which Holdren Co-authored with close colleagues Paul Ehrlich and Anne Ehrlich, leading to accusations that Holdren supported the numerous eugenicist policies outlined in the book. Page 786: Single mothers should have their babies taken away by the government; or they could be forced to have abortions“One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone.
If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it. Adoption proceedings probably should remain more difficult for single people than for married couples, in recognition of the relative difficulty of raising children alone.
It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society.”Page 787-8: Mass sterilization of humans though drugs in the water supply is OK as long as it doesn’t harm livestock“Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control.
Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock.”Page 786-7: The government could control women’s reproduction by either sterilizing them or implanting mandatory long-term birth controlInvoluntary fertility control“A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.
The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.”Page 838: The kind of people who cause “social deterioration” can be compelled to not have children“If some individuals contribute to general social deterioration by overproducing children, and if the need is compelling, they can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility—just as they can be required to exercise responsibility in their resource-consumption patterns—providing they are not denied equal protection.“Page 838:
Nothing is wrong or illegal about the government dictating family size“In today’s world, however, the number of children in a family is a matter of profound public concern. The law regulates other highly personal matters. For example, no one may lawfully have more than one spouse at a time. Why should the law not be able to prevent a person from having more than two children?”Page 942-3: A “Planetary Regime” should control the global economy and dictate by force the number of children allowed to be bornToward a Planetary Regime
“Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist.
Thus the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DCs to LDCs, and including all food on the international market.”“The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits.
Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.”Page 917: We will need to surrender national sovereignty to an armed international police force“If this could be accomplished, security might be provided by an armed international organization, a global analogue of a police force. Many people have recognized this as a goal, but the way to reach it remains obscure in a world where factionalism seems, if anything, to be increasing.
The first step necessarily involves partial surrender of sovereignty to an international organization.”Page 749: Pro-family and pro-birth attitudes are caused by ethnic chauvinism“Another related issue that seems to encourage a pronatalist attitude in many people is the question of the differential reproduction of social or ethnic groups.
Many people seem to be possessed by fear that their group may be outbred by other groups. White Americans and South Africans are worried there will be too many blacks, and vice versa. The Jews in Israel are disturbed by the high birth rates of Israeli Arabs, Protestants are worried about Catholics, and lbos about Hausas. Obviously, if everyone tries to outbreed everyone else, the result will be catastrophe for all.
This is another case of the “tragedy of the commons,” wherein the “commons” is the planet Earth. Fortunately, it appears that, at least in the DCs, virtually all groups are exercising reproductive restraint.”Page 944: As of 1977, we are facing a global overpopulation catastrophe that must be resolved at all costs by the year 2000“Humanity cannot afford to muddle through the rest of the twentieth century; the risks are too great, and the stakes are too high.
This may be the last opportunity to choose our own and our descendants’ destiny. Failing to choose or making the wrong choices may lead to catastrophe. But it must never be forgotten that the right choices could lead to a much better world.”The dogma doesn't end there.Obama's Science Czar: Traditional family is obsolete, punish large families
Holdren and the Ehrlichs write: Radical changes in family structure and relationships are inevitable, whether population control is instituted or not. Inaction, attended by a steady deterioration in living conditions for the poor majority, will bring changes everywhere that no one could consider beneficial. Thus, it is beside the point to object to population-control measures simply on the grounds that they might change the social structure or family relationships.
Holdren, with a blithe “of course,” encourages government to wage an effective war on the family in America. It begins with the abolition of “pronatalist” policies and continues with their complete reversal: As United States taxpayers know, income tax laws have long implicitly encouraged marriage and childbearing...Such a pronatalist bias of course is no longer appropriate.
In countries that are affluent enough for the majority of citizens to pay taxes, tax laws could be adjusted to favor (instead of penalize) single people, working wives, and small families. Other tax measures might also include high marriage fees, taxes on luxury baby goods and toys, and removal of family allowances where they exist. Other possibilities include the limitation of maternal or educational benefits to two children per family.
Here are more links, read them and decide for yourself if these are the kinds of folks you want crafting a nationwide health care plan.John Holdren, Obama's Science Czar, says: Forced abortions and mass sterilization needed to save the planetObama's science czar suggested compulsory abortion, sterilizationObama Science Advisor Called For “Planetary Regime” To Enforce Totalitarian Population Control MeasuresPartisan blinders are funny.
They cloud people's intellect and allow otherwise well meaning and caring citizens to rally with a herd mentality behind the latest political savior. Just like conservatives could see, hear and speak no evil with the criminal presidency of George W. Bush.
Today we see others ignoring the obvious eugenic philosophy of major Obama health care advisers to rally support behind their party. I challenge liberals and conservatives alike to break your political chains. Your government is full of criminals, Republican and Democrat, who seek cradle to grave control over the citizens they work for - at the behest of their globalist controllers.
These eugenic-loving, control-freak globalists manipulate their political whores via payoffs, extortion, blackmail, providing vice, and other mafia-like forms of control. This health care plan is not going to help anyone they claim it will help. The old and poor will still die. The feeble and ill of all ages will be ignored and/or denied service.
Just as with the military-industrial complex and the Wall Street bankster bailout/heist, this industrial-health care complex will do nothing but create a larger and more corrupt government bureaucracy to screw We the People. With this plan, even more of our tax dollars will be funneled to the private Federal Reserve and the private offshore banks that control it. And our Constitution, our freedoms, our liberties, our economy and our Republic's' future will be systematically gangraped that much closer to oblivion.Then the international banking cartel's goal of enslaving the United States will be complete.
Posted by waketheherd at 10:29 AM